Idiot’s Proprietary Might Make More Sense
I can’t help it, I got that One of These Things Doesn’t Belong song from Sesame Street stuck in my head. Geez, I hope I don’t have to pay a royalty on the use of the title. Sounds paranoid and ridiculous, or is it?
I am digging through some old posts and came across one referencing an article about someone being sued for refilling an ink cartridge. It seems that since the Lexmark cartridge was labeled “single use” the consumer is liable for not using it as agreed. That story goes back to 2005. Some folks back then were saying that the courts would not tolerate such for long and that things would change. Have they?
We currently have DRM coffee machines! Also, while you still have the right to “jail break” your iPhone, it is illegal share the knowledge of how you do so. Advice to the youngsters, don’t become and engineer and design a plane, instead become an attorney and protect a toy plane. The toy plane has more copyright protection than the one that actually flies. Better yet, rip off a mouse toy, change the name slightly and keep it protected forever.
I am no attorney but it seems that copyright and patent law is far removed from any intelligent approach to fostering new technology and innovation. Historically speaking, such law is a rather new concept. Perhaps it is just a bad idea and we should consider something more intelligent?
- What Is Intellectual Property? (ballbhandoutnotes.wordpress.com)
- Understanding Intellectual Property (benthamsciencepublishers.wordpress.com)
- Court: Static Control can move forward with Lexmark suit (sanfordherald.com)
- What is Intellectual Property Law? (patentlyo.com)